Netherlands Municipal elections 2018 — Results
- Local parties: 28.65%
- People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD): 13.50%
- Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA): 13.41%
- Democrats 66 (D66): 9.18%
- GreenLeft (GL): 8.87%
- Labour Party (PvdA): 7.52%
- Socialist Party (SP): 4.44%
- Christian Union (CU): 3.83%
Turnout: 54.97%
About this election
Background
The 2018 Dutch municipal elections, held on 21 March 2018 across most of the country's municipalities, chose the local councils (gemeenteraden) that govern at the lowest tier of Dutch administration. As in every recent local election, the dominant story was the strength of independent local parties, which together won far more votes than any national party — a long-running feature of Dutch local democracy. The vote was held on the same day as the national referendum on the Intelligence and Security Services Act.
How the voting works
Each municipality elects its council by proportional representation, with the number of seats fixed by population. Candidates may stand for national parties' local branches or for purely local lists (lokale partijen) that contest only one municipality. The councils choose the aldermen (wethouders) who, with the centrally appointed mayor, form the municipal executive. Because local lists do not aggregate into a single national party, their combined vote is reported here as one "Local parties" figure, even though it represents hundreds of separate organisations.
The outcome
Local parties won 28.65% of the national vote and around 2,600 council seats — comfortably the largest bloc. Among the national parties, the VVD (13.50%) and CDA (13.41%) led, followed by D66 (9.18%) and GroenLinks (8.87%), which made strong gains in the big cities, most symbolically in Amsterdam, where it became the largest party. The Labour Party (7.52%) continued to struggle. The result reinforced the picture of fragmentation and localism that characterises the Dutch municipal level.
Turnout and regional patterns
Turnout was 54.97%, boosted somewhat by the concurrent referendum. Local parties topped the vote in every province, but their dominance was greatest in the south and the periphery — Limburg and North Brabant, where local and regional lists are deeply entrenched — and weakest in the urbanised province of Utrecht, where the national parties hold up better. The map above shows the leading party (or the aggregate of local parties) in each province; click any province for the full breakdown.
What followed
The 2018 results fed into months of local coalition-building across hundreds of municipalities. The continued rise of local parties, and the contrast between the green-left strength in the cities and the dominance of local lists in the regions, previewed the urban-rural divide that would define national politics over the following years. GroenLinks's urban breakthrough, in particular, presaged its prominence in the 2019 European and provincial campaigns.
Source
Official results from the Electoral Council (Kiesraad) — verkiezingsuitslagen.nl. The provincial map aggregates the Kiesraad's municipal results to province level.
Compiled and reviewed from official results by ElectioMap. See our data methodology.
In numbers
- 15.15 points separated Local parties from People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD).
- The top two shared 42.15% of the vote between them, and 6 lists cleared 5%.
- Support for Local parties ranged from 41.34% in Limburg to 18.86% in Utrecht — a spread of 22.48 points across 12 regions, and it led in 12 of 12.
- Turnout of 54.97% is the highest of the 2 municipal electionss covered here since 2018.
Calculated from the official figures on this page and from the other elections of this type in our archive.
Understanding this election
- D’Hondt vs Sainte-Laguë — how a divisor formula turns vote shares into seats
- How Electoral Systems Work Around the World — first-past-the-post, proportional and mixed systems, with real numbers
- Why Election Maps Look Different From the Popular Vote — why a map can look one-sided when the vote was close