Turnout: 58.90%

The vote in brief

Finland's municipal elections of 9 April 2017 chose councillors for the country's 295 municipal councils, which run schools, local planning and — at the time — much of social and health care. The National Coalition Party finished first nationally with about 20.68% of the vote, narrowly ahead of the Social Democrats (19.38%) and the Centre Party (17.53%). The Greens made notable gains in the cities. Because Finland's rural municipalities are numerous and small, the Centre Party won by far the most individual council seats (over 2,800) despite trailing in national vote share. Turnout was 58.9%.

Electoral system

Municipal councillors are elected every four years by open-list proportional representation (d'Hondt) within each municipality; voters choose an individual candidate, whose vote also counts for the party list. Council size scales with the municipality's population. Distinctively, non-citizens resident in Finland — including other EU nationals and longer-term residents from outside the EU — may vote in municipal (though not parliamentary) elections.

Main parties

All of Finland's national parties contest the municipal elections, but their relative strength varies sharply by geography: the National Coalition Party is strongest in the larger towns and affluent suburbs, the Centre Party dominates the rural municipalities, and the Social Democrats draw on industrial and working-class areas. The Greens, the Left Alliance, the Finns Party, the Swedish People's Party and the Christian Democrats complete the field.

The rural-urban seat paradox

The standout feature of Finnish local elections is that a party can lead the national vote yet trail badly in seats. Because Finland has hundreds of small rural councils, the Centre Party's rural dominance converts into thousands of councillors, while the National Coalition's urban votes are concentrated in a smaller number of large councils. This produced the recurring pattern of the National Coalition winning the vote and the Centre winning the seats.

Political context

The 2017 elections were held while Juha Sipilä's centre-right national government was attempting a sweeping health-and-social-services and regional reform (the "sote" reform), which would eventually move health care away from municipalities altogether. That lent the local vote unusual national significance, as it touched directly on the services councils were responsible for.

The Greens' urban advance

The clearest trend was the rise of the Greens in the cities, where climate and urban-quality-of-life issues resonated with younger voters. The result foreshadowed the party's strong showing in the 2019 parliamentary and European elections, confirming a growing urban-rural divide in Finnish politics.

Participation

Turnout was 58.9%, typical for Finnish municipal elections, which consistently draw fewer voters than parliamentary contests. Local turnout tends to be higher in small municipalities, where individual candidates are personally known, than in the big cities.

Why it matters

As a mid-term test of the Sipilä government, the 2017 result was mixed: the National Coalition's first place was a relative bright spot for the coalition, but the Centre Party's weaker vote share signalled the erosion that would culminate in its collapse in 2019. These were also among the last municipal elections before health care passed to the new wellbeing services counties.

Official source

Statistics Finland (Tilastokeskus) and the Ministry of Justice election results service — stat.fi.

Compiled and reviewed by Bartłomiej Paruzel, Election Data Analyst, from official results. See our data methodology.

All Finland elections & results →